It used to be simple. Producer had a product. Product was not that different from other products on a functional level. Advertising people came in and turned product into a brand. Giving the product an aura of specialness that helped marketers sleep tight mumbling happily ‘intangible emotional benefits’. But then things got more complicated. There was The Internet. There were Involved People. There was Dialogue. Opinion. After a period of confusion, luckily there were the advertising people again. They looked a bit different though. They were interactive. But an interactive campaign is still a campaign. And the interactiveness didn’t solve the real problem: people being able to scratch away the brand layer, asking questions, being interested in proof instead of promise. Now the marketers were not the only people getting less sleep, the advertising people started to look grumpier too. But the truth is: they might as well start sleeping again. Since innovation won’t come from advertising agencies. The revolution is coming from design agencies.
Innovation won’t come from advertising agencies. The revolution is coming from design agencies
Why? First of all because they have a creative process that is totally product centred instead of campaign centred. Secondly, because if we strip away all the brand layers, design is what people buy.
Let’s go back to that simple place. In the bare essence: why would you buy a product with a certain producer? It’s the way a product looks (packaging design), it’s the way it works (product design), it’s the way you are treated (service design), it’s the way you experience the store (retail design) and it’s the way you are convinced (persuasion design). So, if products and producers themselves are becoming more and more the real interest of consumers, marketers should invest in design to make products and themselves genuinely worthwhile again. And look for agencies that have design thinking at their core.













Hi Astrid,
I just want to let you know that I totally agree with you here!
Cheers,
Ronald
Same here. This is something I’ve been pondering for a while. Adding that all of these designs can work on a very basic, emotional level, not just be functional.
Thanks so much Ronald!
I also believe we are moving back the pudding itself. But reading your story I get an itch: convinced by persuasion design? That sounds like good old advertising all over again…?
Hi Tom,
I can imagine, but what persuasion design for me is not making up promises and seducing people. For me persuasion design is about for once and for all looking how we can influence behaviour based on psychological principles. If we can use persuasion design to influence people’s behaviour for the sake of good (let’s say start running or be warned for counterfeit medicine) and actually help people to make their life’s better with meaningful design…I’m in. And yes this can totally have a commercial side effect (sell running shoes), but still you also really try to add something. You should watch the presentation from this other Tom (De Bruyne) which he held on TEDx Delft and I hope you get what I am getting at. I will post the link as soon as I can find it. Astrid
Hey Judit,
You are so right. I get very emotional if I look at my Mac Air (I seriously are considering to marry it). But seriously: great design is absolutely a great source of emotional value.
Astrid
Google seem to believe in ‘intangible emotional benefits’.
Like…People first, product second and the ad campaign a long, long way down.
Or, as mr. Ogilvy once said: “If it isn’t honest, it isn’t advertising”.